Latest Cover

Online Office

Contact Us

Issue:ISSN 1000-7083
          CN 51-1193/Q
Director:Sichuan Association for Science and Technology
Sponsored by:Sichuan Society of Zoologists; Chengdu Giant Panda Breeding Research Foundation; Sichuan Association of Wildlife Conservation; Sichuan University
Address:College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, No.29, Wangjiang Road, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, 610064, China
Tel:+86-28-85410485
Fax:+86-28-85410485
Email:scdwzz@vip.163.com & scdwzz001@163.com
Your Position :Home->Past Journals Catalog->2022 Vol.41 No.1

Sexual Dimorphism in the Digit Length and Digit Ratios Among Three Geographical Populations of Eremias arguta from Xinjiang
Author of the article:NIAO Pengying, SHI Lei*
Author's Workplace:College of Life Sciences, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
Key Words:Eremias arguta; sexual dimorphism; geographical population; digit length; digit ratio; Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region
Abstract:Digit ratios are the ratios between different toe lengths of animal. Digit ratios are often regarded as one of the markers of early androgen/estrogen exposure, which affect the morphological characteristics, behavioral performance and physiological mechanism of lizards, and are related to the fitness of lizards. In this study, by measuring the digit length and calculating the digit ratios, the sexual dimorphism of digit length and digit ratios was investigated in three geographical populations of the steppe-runners (Eremias arguta) from Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region. The results showed that the adult males were significantly larger than the females in the second digit lengths of the hind limbs in Yili Basin (P < 0.05), in the second, third, fourth and fifth digit lengths of the fore and hind limbs in Fuyun County (P < 0.05), and in the hind second-to-fourth digit ratio (P < 0.05). In the Tacheng Region, the adult males were significantly longer than the females in the first and fifth digit lengths of the fore limb and the first, second, third and fourth digit lengths of the hind limb (P < 0.05); and the adult males were significantly larger than females in the hind second-to-third digit ratio (P < 0.05). No uniform pattern of sexual dimorphism was detected in the digit length and digit ratios among the three geographical populations of the E. arguta, suggested that they might have evolved independently. Significant differences were detected in the sexual dimorphism of digit length and digit ratios among different geographical populations, and the mechanisms need to be further studied.
2022,41(1): 42-51 收稿日期:2021-06-09
分类号:Q959.6
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(31660613;31260511)
作者简介:鸟鹏颖(1996-),女,硕士研究生,研究方向:动物生态学,E-mail:272105681@qq.com
*通信作者:时磊,E-mail:shileixj@126.com
参考文献:
龚雄, 刘金龙, 周天和, 等. 2018. 新疆博乐和伊犁河谷敏麻蜥的种下分类地位探讨[J]. 四川动物, 37(4):387-399.
梁涛, 吕士鹏, 武开乐, 等. 2015. 旱地沙蜥的两性异形和雌性繁殖投入[J]. 生态学杂志, 34(6):1602-1606.
梁涛, 时磊. 2018. 敏麻蜥卵形状的异速增长与卵大小和数量的权衡[J]. 生态学杂志, 37(9):2761-2767.
梁涛, 郑鹏, 李叶, 等. 2018. 敏麻蜥的两性异形和雌性繁殖输出[J]. 干旱区研究, 35(5):1160-1166.
史红全, 柏军鹏, 范俊功. 2021. 麻雀身体大小的性二态和基于身体量度的性别判定[J]. 四川动物, 40(3):261-269.
万丽霞, 张海军, 李海娇. 2018. 甘肃密点麻蜥三个地理种群的两性异形研究[J]. 四川动物, 37(2):139-148.
王莉, 郑鹏, 时磊. 2020. 不同基质上快步麻蜥的运动表现及其与形态特征的相关性[J]. 干旱区研究, 37(3):799-808.
王欣琪, 梁涛, 安静, 等. 2020. 草原蜥两性的咬合力及头部形态特征比较[J]. 动物学杂志, 5(1):29-36.
席焕久, 赵红, 李文慧, 等. 2012. 对指长比研究现状的初步分析[J]. 解剖学报, 43(4):569-573.
姚冲学, 吕婷, 王方, 等. 2019. 大蹼铃蟾的两性异形[J]. 四川动物, 38(2):194-199, 205.
赵尔宓, 赵肯堂, 周开亚, 等. 1999. 中国动物志爬行纲:第二卷(有鳞目:蜥蜴亚目)[M]. 北京:科学出版社.
赵晓进, 田华香, 胡海洋, 等. 2015. 太行山猕猴指(趾)长比性差[J]. 解剖学报, 46(5):673-678.
Balogová M, Nelson E, Uhrin M, et al. 2015. No sexual dimorphism detected in digit ratios of the fire salamander (Salamandra salamandra)[J]. Anatomical Record, 298(10):1786-1795.
Bergmann PJ, Pettinelli KJ, Crockett ME, et al. 2017. It's just sand between the toes:how particle size and shape variation affect running performance and kinematics in a generalist lizard[J]. Journal of Experimental Biology, 220(20):3706-3716.
Bininda-Emonds OR, Jeffery JE, Sánchez-Villagra MR, et al. 2007. Forelimb-hindlimb developmental timing changes across tetrapod phylogeny[J/OL]. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 7(1):182[2021-03-01]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-7-182.
Breedlove SM. 2010. Minireview:organizational hypothesis:instances of the fingerpost[J]. Endocrinology, 151(9):4116-4122.
Bruinjé AC, Coelho FEA, Paiva TMA, et al. 2019. Aggression, color signaling, and performance of the male color morphs of a Brazilian lizard (Tropidurus semitaeniatus)[J/OL]. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 73:72[2021-03-01]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-019-2673-0.
Chang JL, Doughty S, Wade J, et al. 2006. Sexual dimorphism in the second-to-fourth digit length ratio in green anoles, Anolis carolinensis (Squamata:Polychrotidae), from southeastern United States[J]. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 42(2):1489-1494.
Chang JL. 2008. Sexual dimorphism of the second-to-fourth digit length ratio (2D:4D) in the strawberry poison dart frog (Oophaga pumilio) in Costa Rica[J]. Journal of Herpetology, 42(2):414-416.
Darwin CR. 1871. The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex[M]. Princeton:Princeton University Press.
Direnzo GV, Stynoski JL. 2012. Patterns of second-to-fourth digit length ratios (2D:4D) in two species of frogs and two species of lizards at La Selva, Costa Rica[J]. The Anatomical Record:Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology, 295(4):597-603.
Fairbairn DJ, Roff DA. 2006. The quantitative genetics of sexual dimorphism:assessing the importance of sex-linkage[J]. Heredity, 97(5):319-328.
Gomes CM, Kohlsdorf T. 2011. Evolution of sexual dimorphism in the digit ratio 2D:4D relationships with body size and microhabitat use in iguanian lizards[J/OL]. PLoS ONE, 6(12):e28465[2021-01-10]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028465.
Iraeta P, Monasterio C, Salvador A, et al. 2011. Sexual dimorphism and interpopulation differences in lizard hind limb length:locomotor performance or chemical signalling?[J]. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 104(2):318-329.
Kaczmarski M, Kaczmarek JM, Jankowia Ł, et al. 2021. Digit ratio in the common toad Bufo bufo:the effects of reduced fingers and of age dependency[J/OL]. Zoological Letters, 7:5[2021-01-20]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40851-021-00174-y.
Kaczmarski M, Kubicka AM, Tryjanowski P, et al. 2015. Females have larger ratio of second-to-fourth digits than males in four species of Salamandridae, Caudata[J]. Anatomical Record, 298(8):1424-1430.
Kazimirski P, Kaczmarsk M, Zagalska-Neubauer MM, et al. 2020. Absence of sex differences in digit ratio in nestlings of the white stork Ciconia ciconia, a monomorphic bird species[J]. Bird Study, 66(2):503-509.
Leoni B, Canova L, Saino N. 2005. Sexual dimorphism in metapodial and phalanges length ratios in the wood mouse[J]. Anatomical Record, 286(2):955-961.
Leoni B, Rubolini D, Romano M, et al. 2008. Avian hind-limb digit length ratios measured from radiographs are sexually dimorphic[J]. Journal of Anatomy, 213(4):425-430.
Liang T, Zhou L, He WF, et al. 2018. Variation in reproductive strategies of three populations of Phrynocephalus helioscopus in China[J/OL]. PeerJ, 6:e5705[2021-01-20]. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5705.
Lofeu L, Brandt R, Kohlsdorf T. 2020. Digit identity matters:origin and evolution of sexual dimorphism in the digit lengths of tropidurid lizards[J]. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 131(1):109-121.
Lombardo MP, Thorpe PA. 2008. Digit ratios in green Anolis lizards (Anolis carolinensis)[J]. Anatomical Record, 291(4):433-440.
Lovich JE, Gibbons JW. 1992. A review of techniques for quantifying sexual size dimorphism[J]. Growth Development and Aging, 56(4):269-281.
Manicom C, Alford R, Schoener TW, et al. 2014. Mechanisms causing variation in sexual size dimorphism in three sympatric, congeneric lizards[J]. Ecology, 95(6):1531-1544.
McIntyre MH, Herrmann E, Wobber V, et al. 2009. Bonobos have a more human-like second-to-fourth finger length ratio (2D:4D) than chimpanzees:a hypothesized indication of lower prenatal androgens[J]. Journal of Human Evolution, 56(4):361-365.
Poyarkov NA, Orlova VF, Chirikova MA. 2014. The mitochondrial phylogeography and intraspecific taxonomy of the steppe racerunner, Eremias arguta (Pallas) (Lacertidae:Sauria, Reptilia), reflects biogeographic patterns in Middle Asia[J]. Zootaxa, 3895(2):208-224.
Rubolini D, Pupin F, Sacchi R, et al. 2006. Sexual dimorphism in digit length ratios in two lizard species[J]. Anatomical Record, 288A(5):491-497.
Ruuskanen S, Helle S, Ahola M, et al. 2011. Digit ratios have poor indicator value in a wild bird population[J]. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 65(5):983-994.
Sczcerbak NN. 1971. Taxonomy of the racerunner genus Eremias (Sauria, Reptilia) in relation with areas of desert-steppe faunal formation in the Palaearctics[J]. Vestnik Zoologii, 3895(2):47-55.
Tan WC, Vanhooydonck B, Measey J, et al. 2020. Morphology, locomotor performance and habitat use in southern African agamids[J]. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 130(1):166-177.
Tobler M, Healey M, Olsson M. 2011. Digit ratio, color polymorphism and egg testosterone in the Australian painted dragon[J/OL]. PLoS ONE, 6(1):e16225[2021-01-20]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016225.
Tulli MJ, Abdala V, Cruz FB. 2011. Relationships among morphology, clinging performance and habitat use in Liolaemini lizards[J]. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 24(4):843-855.
Van Damme R, Wijnrocx K, Boeye J, et al. 2015. Digit ratios in two lacertid lizards:sexual dimorphism and morphological and physiological correlates[J]. Zoomorphology, 134(4):565-575.
Voracek M, Loibl LM. 2009. Scientometric analysis and bibliography of digit ratio (2D:4D) research, 1998-2008[J]. Psychological Reports, 104(3):922-956.
Woodhead N, Hare KM, Cree A. 2018. Sexual dimorphism of digit-length ratio in a viviparous lizard:influence of age, but not preservation state or sex of interuterine twin[J]. Anatomical Record, 301(7):1169-1178.
Zheng Z, Cohn MJ. 2011. Developmental basis of sexually dimorphic digit ratios[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(39):16289-16294.
CopyRight©2022 Editorial Office of Sichuan Journal of Zoology 蜀ICP备08107403号-3