Latest Cover

Online Office

Contact Us

Issue:ISSN 1000-7083
          CN 51-1193/Q
Director:Sichuan Association for Science and Technology
Sponsored by:Sichuan Society of Zoologists; Chengdu Giant Panda Breeding Research Foundation; Sichuan Association of Wildlife Conservation; Sichuan University
Address:College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, No.29, Wangjiang Road, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, 610064, China
Tel:+86-28-85410485
Fax:+86-28-85410485
Email:scdwzz@vip.163.com & scdwzz001@163.com
Your Position :Home->Past Journals Catalog->2021 Vol.40 No.1

Application of Gabor Edge Disruption Ratio Method in Animal Disruptive Coloration
Author of the article:XIAO Fanrong, BU Rongping, HUANG Tingting, SHI Haitao*
Author's Workplace:Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Ecology of Tropical Islands, Key Laboratory of Tropical Animal and Plant Ecology of Hainan Province, College of Life Sciences, Hainan Normal University, Haikou 571158, China
Key Words:camouflage; microhabitat; Gabor filter; edge detection
Abstract:Disruptive coloration is a camouflage strategy of prey with high contrast markings that form false body edges and boundaries, and thereby prevents the detection or recognition of predator. Currently, the ratio of false edges to coherent edges of an animals’ outline is the best index of disruptive coloration. Taking the Indochinese box turtle (Cuora galbinifrons) as an example, this study expounds how to quantify the disruptive coloration in vertebrates by using the most advanced Gabor edge disruption ratio (GabRat) method. We also compare the GabRat values of turtles in different microhabitat substrates. The results indicated that the color of the carapace of C. galbinifrons plays an important role in disruptive coloration. Moreover, the GabRat values in turtles preferred deciduous substrates were significantly higher than those in rare habitats including bare grounds and stony substrates. Our study confirms the biological plausibility of GabRat method in quantifying disruptive coloration in vertebrates, and is helpful to understand the definition and mechanism of disruptive coloration.
2021,40(1): 34-38 收稿日期:2020-06-09
分类号:Q959.6
基金项目:海南省自然科学基金面上项目(319MS047);国家自然科学基金面上项目(31772486)
作者简介:肖繁荣(1986-),男,博士,讲师,主要从事动物生态学研究,E-mail:xiao71815@hainnu.edu.cn
*通信作者:史海涛,E-mail:haitao-shi@263.net
参考文献:
肖繁荣, 杨灿朝, 史海涛. 2015. 动物的伪装方式[J]. 四川动物, 34(6):955-960.
许伟, 赖惠成, 齐立飞, 等. 2015. 基于Gabor特征的人脸识别算法的对比研究与实现[J]. 激光杂志, 36(2):41-44.
Cott HB. 1940. Adaptive coloration in animals[M]. London:Methuen & Co. Ltd.
Kang C, Stevens M, Moon JY, et al. 2014. Camouflage through behavior in moths:the role of background matching and disruptive coloration[J]. Behavioral Ecology, 26(1):45-54.
Lovell PG, Ruxton GD, Langridge KV, et al. 2013. Egg-laying substrate selection for optimal camouflage by quail[J]. Current Biology, 23(3):260-264.
Osorio D, Srinivasan MV. 1991. Camouflage by edge enhancement in animal coloration patterns and its implications for visual mechanisms[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society B:Biological Sciences, 244(1310):81-85.
Poulton EB. 1890. The colours of animals:their meaning and use, especially considered in the case of insects[M]. New York:Appleton.
Price N, Green S, Troscianko J,et al. 2019. Background matching and disruptive coloration as habitat-specific strategies for camouflage[J]. Scientific Reports, 9(1):1-10.
Shi HT, Hou M, Pritchard P, et al. 2013. Identification manual for the conservation of turtles in China[M]. Beijing:Encyclopedia of China Publishing House.
Stevens M, Merilaita S. 2011. Animal camouflage:mechanisms and function[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
Stevens M, Parraga CA, Cuthill IC, et al. 2007. Using digital photography to study animal coloration[J]. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 90(2):211-237.
Thayer GH. 1909. Concealing-colouration in the animal kingdom:an exposition of the laws of disguise through colour and pattern, being a summary of Abbot H. Thayer's discoveries[M]. New York:Macmillan.
Troscianko J, Benton CP, Lovell PG, et al. 2009. Camouflage and visual perception[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 364(1516):449-461.
Troscianko J, Skelhorn J, Stevens M. 2017. Quantifying camouflage:how to predict detectability from appearance[J/OL].BMC Evolutionary Biology, 17(1):7[2020-03-30]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-016-0854-2.
Troscianko J, Stevens M, Rands S. 2015. Image calibration and analysis toolbox-a free software suite for objectively measuring reflectance, colour and pattern[J]. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, (11):1320-1331.
Xiao F, Wang J, Shi H, et al. 2017. Ecomorphological correlates of microhabitat selection in two sympatric Asian box turtle species (Geoemydidae:Cuora)[J]. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 95(10):753-758.
Xiao F, Yang C, Shi H, et al. 2016. Background matching and camouflage efficiency predict population density in four-eyed turtle (Sacalia quadriocellata)[J]. Behavioural Processes, 131:40-46.
CopyRight©2021 Editorial Office of Sichuan Journal of Zoology 蜀ICP备08107403号-3