Latest Cover

Online Office

Contact Us

Issue:ISSN 1000-7083
          CN 51-1193/Q
Director:Sichuan Association for Science and Technology
Sponsored by:Sichuan Society of Zoologists; Chengdu Giant Panda Breeding Research Foundation; Sichuan Association of Wildlife Conservation; Sichuan University
Address:College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, No.29, Wangjiang Road, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, 610064, China
Fax:+86-28-85410485 &
Your Position :Home->Past Journals Catalog->2017 Vol.36 No.5

Effects of Predation Risks on Growth and Development of Tylototriton shanjing Larvae
Author of the article:WANG Benjun, LIU Na, HE Yifan, JING Kai*
Author's Workplace:Engineering Research Center of Sustainable Development and Utilization of Biomass Energy, Ministry of Education, School of Life Sciences, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650500, China
Key Words:Tylototriton shanjing; predation risk; larvae; metamorphosis
Abstract:Predation risk is one of the most important selective forces for the phenotype and life history of amphibian larvae during evolution. Water level fluctuation often increased the predation risks on the larvae of Tylototriton shanjing, which is a typical caudate amphibian species in montane environment of Yunnan province, China. In this study, effects of predation risks on early ontogeny of T. shanjing had been explored by observing the variations of body length and body mass, as well as the differences of time at metamorphosis under different predation risk situations. Four treatments were designed to investigate the predation risk of T. shanjing:no predation treatment, conspecific individuals' treatment, injured individuals treatment, and invasion predators treatment. Finally, we observed that newt larvae showed different growth and development under different predation risk conditions. In the early stage of the development, the growth rates of the newt larvae in the four treatments were identical. However, significantly increased growth rate of newt larvae was observed at the middle and late stages in the predation risk treatment group. Body length and body mass of the newt larvae at metamorphosis stage after the predation risk treatment was much longer and heavier than those of the no predators treatment. Moreover, the time duration of metamorphosis stage of predation risk treated newt larvae were shorter than those of the no predation risk treatment. These results suggested that newt larvae adapt to high predation risk environment by speeding up the growth rate at late stage of embryonic development and shortening the time duration of metamorphosis.
2017,36(5): 513-518 收稿日期:2017-04-13
戴强, 戴建洪, 李成, 等. 2004. 仙姑弹琴蛙蝌蚪对陌生捕食者克氏原螯虾的反捕反应[J]. 生物多样性, 12(5):481-487.
费梁, 胡淑琴, 叶昌媛, 等. 2006. 中国动物志 两栖纲(上卷)总论、蚓螈目、有尾目[M]. 北京:科学出版社.
王朝芳, 费梁, 叶昌媛. 1984. 蓝尾蝾螈早期发育的初步观察[J]. 动物学杂志, 19(6):4-7.
Caldwell JP, Thorp JH, Jervey TO. 1980. Predator-prey relationships among larval dragonflies, salamanders, and frogs[J]. Oecologia, 46(3):285-289.
Chivers DP, Smith RJF. 1997. Chemical alarm signaling in aquatic predator/prey interactions:a review and prospectus[J]. Ecoscience, 5(3):338-352.
Chivers DP, Kiesecker JM, Marco A, et al. 1999. Shifts in life history as a response to predation in western toads (Bufo boreas)[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 25(11):2455-2463.
Collins JP, Cheek JE. 1983. Effect of food and density on development of typical and cannibalistic salamander larvae in Ambystoma tigrinum nebulosum[J]. American Zoologist, 23(1):77-84.
Cruz MJ, Rebelo R. 2005. Vulnerability of southwest Iberian amphibians to an introduced crayfish, Procambarus clarkii[J]. Amphibia-Reptilia, 26(3):293-303.
Cupp Jr PV. 1994. Salamanders avoid chemical cues from predators[J]. Animal Behaviour, 48(1):232-235.
Drake DL, Anderson TL, Smith LM, et al. 2014. Predation of eggs and recently hatched larvae of endemic ringed salamanders (Ambystoma annulatum) by native and introduced aquatic predators[J]. Herpetologica, 70(4):378-387.
Lardner B. 2000. Morphological and life history responses to predators in larvae of seven anurans[J].Oikos, 88(1):169-180.
Laurila A, Kujasalo J, Ranta E. 1998. Predator-induced changes in life history in two anuran tadpoles:effects of predator diet[J]. Oikos, 83(2):307-317.
Mathis A. 1998. Alarm responses to chemical stimuli from damaged conspeciıcs by larval anurans:tests of three neotropical species[J]. Herpetologica, 54(3):402-408.
Mathis A. 2003. Use of chemical cues in detection of conspecific predators and prey by newts, Notophthalmus viridescens[J]. Chemoecology, 13(4):193-197.
McCollum SA,Leimberger JD. 1997. Predator-induced morphological changes in an amphibian:predation by dragonflies affects tadpole shape and color[J]. Oecologia, 109(4):615-621.
Orizaola G, Braña F. 2005. Plasticity in newt metamorphosis:the effect of predation at embryonic and larval stages[J]. Freshwater Biology, 50(3):438-446.
Petranka JW, Kats LB, Sih A. 1987. Predator-prey interactions among fish and larval amphibians:use of chemical cues to detect predatory fish[J]. Animal Behaviour, 35(2):420-425.
Polich RL, Searcy CA, Shaffer HB. 2013. Effects of tail-clipping on survivorship and growth of larval salamanders[J]. Journal of Wildlife Management, 77(7):1420-1425.
Saidapur SK, Veeranagoudar DK, Hiragond NC, et al. 2009. Mechanism of predator-prey detection and behavioral responses in some anuran tadpoles[J]. Chemoecology, 19(1):21-28.
Vonesh JR. 2005. Sequential predator effects across three life stages of the African tree frog, Hyperolius spinigularis[J]. Oecologia, 143(2):280-290.
Werner EE. 1986. Amphibian metamorphosis:growth rate, predation risk, and the optimal size at transformation[J]. American Naturalist, 128(3):319-341.
Zhao J, Yang Y, Xi X, et al. 2014. Artificial warming increases size at metamorphosis in plateau frogs (Rana kukunoris) in the presence of predators[J]. Aquatic Ecology, 48(4):423-434.
CopyRight©2020 Editorial Office of Sichuan Journal of Zoology