Latest Cover

Online Office

Contact Us

Issue:ISSN 1000-7083
          CN 51-1193/Q
Director:Sichuan Association for Science and Technology
Sponsored by:Sichuan Society of Zoologists; Chengdu Giant Panda Breeding Research Foundation; Sichuan Association of Wildlife Conservation; Sichuan University
Address:College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, No.29, Wangjiang Road, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, 610064, China
Tel:+86-28-85410485
Fax:+86-28-85410485
Email:scdwzz@vip.163.com & scdwzz001@163.com
Your Position :Home->Past Journals Catalog->2017 Vol.36 No.2

Thinking about the Supervision of Animal Release
Author of the article:GONG Minghao1*, WANG Junyan1, ZHANG Ling2, LIU Gang1
Author's Workplace:1. Research Institute of Wetland, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China;
2. China Wildlife Conservation Association, Beijing 100714, China
Key Words:animal release; supervision; ecological invasion; ecological security; technical standards
Abstract:Prayer animal release has long been a religion custom and is practiced widely in China. Because of the lack of professional guidance and supervision, animal releases have caused a series of environmental accidents including pollutions and species invasions, and resulted in a large number of excess death of release animals, public security problem and illegal poaching increasing, and these had significant negative impacts on the production and living of local residents, as well as on the wildlife protection and management. At the same time, this also ran counter to the original meaning of animal release in Buddhist teachings. The new revision of the Law of the People's Republic of China on the Protection of Wildlife in 2016 introduced provisions of animal release, and provided clear and unequivocal legal basis for supervision and control to animal release, and met the actual need of current nature conservation in China. According to the requirement of new law, the management on animal releasing should be enhanced. In this article, we suggested to formulate the regulation of animal releasing based on the new law to improve its feasibility, appoint the specific management department, and build the technical standards and management process of animal release including the environment for animal releases, the number of prayer animals, the fitness and environmental impacts of prayer animals, the time and the place for releases, as well as the monitoring plan after animal releases. We hope these can provide technique and regulation supporting to ensure that animal releases are practiced in a scientific, well-organized and safe way. Simultaneously, based on the consideration that animal releasing was still a human disturbance to natural ecosystem, it should be banned and replaced by the program of field conservation to reach its religious goal consistently in the long term.
2017,36(2): 227-231 收稿日期:2016-09-28
DOI:10.11984/j.issn.1000-7083.20160265
分类号:X37
作者简介:龚明昊(1973-),男,博士,研究方向:珍稀动物濒危机制和保护管理*通讯作者:龚明昊,E-mail:gongmh2005@hotmail.com
参考文献:
丁晖, 马方舟, 吴军, 等. 2015. 关于构建我国外来入侵物种环境危害防控监督管理体系的思考[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 31(5):652-657.
冯军. 2010. 中国"放生"习俗渊源简论[J]. 五邑大学学报(社会科学版), 12(2):61-63.
耿国彪. 2012. 从柳州食人鱼事件看外来物种入侵[J]. 绿色中国, (15):10-11.
李加太. 2009. 论藏族放生习俗的形成及其生态特征[J]. 青海师范大学民族师范学院学报, (2):54-56.
李菁纹, 姚正得, 李岱芬, 等. 2005. 画眉与台湾画眉间的遗传渗漏[C]//台湾野生生物遗传多样性与保育遗传研究研讨会论文集. 台北:153-168.
李木源. 2006. 放生还是放死:提倡以护生和素食代替放生[N]. 联合早报言论版, 2006-6-20.
刘丹, 史海涛, 刘宇翔, 等. 2011. 红耳龟在我国分布现状的调查[J]. 生物学通报, 46(6):18-21.
罗玮, 赵先富, 胡征宇. 2001. 迎接入侵种的挑战[J]. 水生生物学报, 25(5):516-523.
钱翌. 2001. 生态入侵的危害及防范对策[J]. 新疆农业大学学报, 24(4):62-64.
王喆辰. 2016. 别把"放生"变"杀生"[J]. 科学大众:中学生, (3):32-34.
许智伟. 2007. 放生与宗教团体的发展:以中华护生协会为例[D]. 台湾:南华大学.
杨红珍, 杨静, 李湘涛. 2015. 从科学角度谈动物放生[J]. 生物学通报, 50(8):4-8.
张春兰, 王建荣, 胡慧建. 2007. 2004年下半年广东野生鸟类禽流感研究初报[J]. 四川动物, 26(1):155-156, 160.
张润志, 张大勇, 叶万辉, 等. 2004. 农业外来生物入侵种研究现状与发展趋势[J]. 植物保护, 30(3):5-9.
张宪中, 胡海彦, 曹晓东, 等. 2010. 五里湖鱼类资源群落结构及生物多样性的时空分析[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 25(4):314-319.
中国佛教网第121次放生法会圆满举行[EB/OL]. (2011-7-23)[2011-8-24]. http://www.fjfs.net/e/action/ShowInfo.phpclassid=7&id=3478.
Griffith B, Scott JM, Carpenter JW, et al. 1989. Translocation as a species conservation tool:status and strategy[J]. Science, 245(4917):477-480.
Hedrick PW. 2007. Genetic conservation in captive populations and endangered species[M]//Jain SK, Botsford LW. Applied population biology. Dordrecht:Springer Netherlands, 67:45-68.
Kleiman DG, Price MRS, Beck BB. 1994. Criteria for reintroductions[M]//Olney PJS, Mace GM, Feistner ATC. Creative conservation. Dordrecht:Springer Netherlands:287-303.
Leberg PL. 1993. Strategies for population reintroduction:effects of genetic variability on population growth and size[J]. Conservation Biology, 7(1):194-199.
Seddon PJ, Armstrong DP, Aloney RF. 2007. Developing the science of reintroduction biology[J]. Conservation Biology, (21):303-312.
Severinghaus LL, Chi L. 1999. Prayer animal release in Taiwan[J]. Biological Conservation, 89(3):301-304.
Viggers KL, Lindenmayer DB, Spratt DM. 1993. The importance of disease in reintroduction programmes[J]. Wildlife Research, 20(5):687-698.
White TH Jr., Collar NJ, Moorhouse RJ, et al. 2012. Psittacine reintroductions:common denominators of success[J]. Biological Conservation, 148(1):106-115.
CopyRight©2017 Editorial Office of Sichuan Journal of Zoology