Latest Cover

Online Office

Contact Us

Issue:ISSN 1000-7083
          CN 51-1193/Q
Director:Sichuan Association for Science and Technology
Sponsored by:Sichuan Society of Zoologists; Chengdu Giant Panda Breeding Research Foundation; Sichuan Association of Wildlife Conservation; Sichuan University
Address:College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, No.29, Wangjiang Road, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, 610064, China
Fax:+86-28-85410485 &
Your Position :Home->Past Journals Catalog->2017 Vol.36 No.2

Reproduction Ecological Traits and Adaptation of Fulica atra in Zoige Plateau Wetland
Author of the article:XIAO Yue, ZHAO Chenhao, LIU Wei, WU Yongjie, RAN Jianghong*
Author's Workplace:Key Laboratory of Bio-resources and Eco-environment of Ministry of Education, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
Key Words:Fulica atra; Zoige; alpine wetland; reproduction; wetland birds; nest-site selection
Abstract:The reproductive ecology and the adaptation to highland habitats of the common coot (Fulica atra) were studied in Zoige Plateau Wetland. The results showed that the average nesting period of coots in Zoige was 6.73 d±0.36 d, the average height of the nests above water was 7.83 cm±0.64 cm, the average clutch size was 5.83 eggs±2.15 eggs, the average mass of egg was 31.90 g±0.37 g, the average incubation time was 26.64 d±2.83 d, and no old nests were reutilized. Compared with the coots breeding in low plain wetland, the coots living in high and cold Zoige Plateau Wetland had smaller clutch size, longer hatching period, and preferred to nest in the habitat close to aquatic vegetation with moderate coverage and high height of water plants. The results of principal component analysis indicated that there were 3 principal components affecting the nest-site selection of the coots in Zoige Plateau Wetland:safety factor, traffic factor and intraspecific competition factor. When compared with the coots living in low plain wetland, coots in Zoige Plateau Wetland would choose the nest sites with better shelter and safety, and this might be an adaptation strategy under the variable climate of plateau and high predation pressure.
2017,36(2): 217-222 收稿日期:2016-09-14
程鲲, 马建章, 李金波, 等. 2010. 黑龙江安邦河自然保护区白骨顶营巢及领域特征[J]. 四川动物, 29(3):372-375.
程鲲. 2008. 自然保护区生态旅游特征界定及旅游活动对白骨顶繁殖行为的影响[D]. 哈尔滨:东北林业大学.
丁长青, 郑光美. 1997. 黄腹角雉的巢址选择[J]. 动物学报, 1:27-33.
李承龄, 江永生. 1989. 骨顶鸡的捕获量与食性[J]. 野生动物学报, 4:11-12, 39.
张微微, 马建章, 李金波. 2010. 骨顶鸡(Fulica atra)的巢址选择研究[J]. 东北师大学报(自然科学版), 42(3):114-120.
张微微, 马建章, 李金波. 2011a. 骨顶鸡的种内巢寄生现象及其抵御机制初探[J]. 动物学杂志, 46(6):19-23.
张微微, 马建章, 李金波. 2011b. 骨顶鸡等游禽对不同人为干扰的行为响应[J]. 生态学报, 31(6):1695-1702.
张微微. 2010. 骨顶鸡的繁殖行为及其对人为干扰的响应[D]. 哈尔滨:东北林业大学.
中国林业网. 2009. 四川若尔盖湿地国家级自然保护区[R/OL]. (2009-6-4)[2016-6-9].
Abdi H, Williams LJ. 2010. Principal component analysis[J]. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics, 2(4):433-459.
Arnold KE, Owens IPF. 2002. Extra-pair paternity and intraspecific brood parasitism:life history, parental care and the risk of retaliation[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 269:1263-1269.
Arnold TW, Armstrong T. 1987. Egg viability, nest predation, and the adaptive significance of clutch size in prairie ducks[J]. American Naturalist, 130(5):643-653.
Brinkhof MWG. 1997. Seasonal variation in food supply and breeding success in European coots Fulica atra[J]. Ardea, 85(1):51-65.
Eggers S, Griesser M, Nystrand M, et al. 2006. Predation risk induces changes in nest-site selection and clutch size in the Siberian jay[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, 273(1587):701-706.
International Union for Conservation of Nature. 2016. The IUCN Red List[EB/OL]. (2016-9-4)[2016-9-4].
Lack D. 1985. The natural regulation of animal numbers[M]//Cody ML. Habitat selection in birds. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
Lima SL. 1987. Clutch size in birds:a predation perspective[J]. Ecology, 68(4):1062-1070.
Lu X. 2011. Reproductive ecology of three Tibetan waterbird species, with special reference to life-history alterations along elevational gradients[J]. Zoological Studies, 50(2):192-202.
Randler C. 2005a. Coots Fulica atra, reduce their vigilance under increased competition[J]. Behavioural Processes, 68(2):173-178.
Randler C. 2005b. Vigilance during preening in coots Fulica atra[J]. Ethology, 111(2):169-178.
Randler C. 2006. Disturbances by dog barking increase vigilance in coots Fulica atra[J]. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 52(4):265-270.
Ręk P. 2010. Testing the relationship between clutch size and brood size in the coot (Fulica atra)[J]. Journal of Ornithology, 151(1):163-168.
Rizi H, Benyacoub S, Chabi Y. 1999. Nesting and reproductive characteristics of coots Fulica atra breeding on two lakes in Algeria[J]. Aideola, 46(2):179-186.
Slagsvold T. 1982. Clutch size variation in passerine birds:the nest predation hypothesis[J]. Oecologia, 54(54):159-169.
Staneviěius V. 2002. Nest-site selection by coot and great-crested grebe in relation to structure of halophytes[J]. Acta Zoologica Lituanica, 12(3):265-275.
Uzun A, Uzun B, Kopij G. 2010. The effect of clutch size on egg and hatchling mass and measurements in the common coot Fulica atra[J]. Ekoloji, 19(74):160-163.
CopyRight©2018 Editorial Office of Sichuan Journal of Zoology