Latest Cover

Online Office

Contact Us

Issue:ISSN 1000-7083
          CN 51-1193/Q
Director:Sichuan Association for Science and Technology
Sponsored by:Sichuan Society of Zoologists; Chengdu Giant Panda Breeding Research Foundation; Sichuan Association of Wildlife Conservation; Sichuan University
Address:College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, No.29, Wangjiang Road, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, 610064, China
Tel:+86-28-85410485
Fax:+86-28-85410485
Email:scdwzz@vip.163.com & scdwzz001@163.com
Your Position :Home->Past Journals Catalog->2016 Vol.35 No.6

Breeding Behavior of Garrulax sannio in Chengdu and Its Adaptation to the Urban Environments
Author of the article:YAN Yong, CHAI Luyan, WU Yongjie, DOU Liang, RAN Jianghong*
Author's Workplace:Key Laboratory of Eco-resource and Eco-environment of Ministry of Education, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China
Key Words:Garrulax sannio; breeding behavior; adaptive changes; urbanization; nest-site selection; incubation rhythm
Abstract:The breeding behavior of the white-browed laughingthrush (Garrulax sannio) was systematically studied from 2012 to 2013 in the Wangjiang campus of Sichuan University, which is located in Chengdu urban area. Compared with the previous studies of G. sannio in different periods and sites, we found that:(1) G. sannio would use diversified nest materials, including the human garbage; (2) They mostly nested in high trees of urban area while nesting in bamboos or low trees of suburban area; (3) The main factors affecting the nest-site selection were tree breast-height diameter, nest height, and tree height; (4) The contemporary incubation time of G. sannio was shortened to 11~12 d compared to 15~17 d in 1950s; (5) The mean feeding phase of G. sannio was 12 d, but the egg weight, daily feeding frequency, weight and length of nestling on leaving-nest day of the birds in urban area were higher than those in suburban area; (6)The breeding success rate was 73.3% in urban area compared with 23.1% in suburban area. Compared with those living in suburban area, G. sannio of urban area evolved adaptive changes of breeding behavior that helped them become the dominant urban species in the process of urbanization.
2016,35(6): 936-941 收稿日期:2016-08-16
DOI:10.11984/j.issn.1000-7083.201600221
分类号:Q959.7;Q958.1
作者简介:严勇(1992-),男,硕士研究生,研究方向为保护生物学,E-mail:396566617@qq.com
*通讯作者:冉江洪,E-mail:rjhong-01@163.com
参考文献:
曹长雷, 戴玄, 韩宗先, 等. 2013. 长江师范学院校园白颊噪鹛取食生态位的初步研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 52(2):402-404.
柴璐艳, 赵璐玲, 纪维雯, 等. 2014. 城市白颊噪鹛群体非繁殖季节的行为节律及时间分配[J]. 四川动物, 33(1):66-70.
李桂垣. 1982. 白颊噪鹛繁殖习性的初步观察[J]. 动物学研究, 3(3):245-250.
李明, 郭延蜀, 韩艳良, 等. 2009. 白颊噪鹛四川亚种繁殖期鸣声声谱分析[J]. 四川动物, 28(6):913-916.
李偲, 张敦房, 黄科. 2010. 四川大学江安校区鸟类调查[J]. 四川动物, 29(2):249-254.
吴先智, 杨靖, 朱章顺, 等. 2005. 成都市区公共绿地野生鸟类调查初报[J]. 四川动物, 24(4):568-574.
晏林波, 周材权, 袁施彬, 等. 2012. 南充市同域分布的白腰文鸟白颊噪鹛和白头鹎巢和巢材比较研究[J]. 内江师范学院学报, 27(12):43-47.
杨建欣, 白洁. 2010. 四川大学望江校区校园植物配置[J]. 中国城市林业, 8(2):25-27.
杨振才, 牛翠娟, 孙儒泳. 2002. 温度对中华鳖卵孵化和胚胎发育的影响[J]. 动物学报, 48(6):716-724.
叶淑英, 郭书林, 路纪琪. 2015. 中国城市鸟类生态学研究进展与展望[J]. 河南教育学院学报(自然科学版), 24(3):47-53.
于同雷, 符建荣, 郭延蜀. 2011. 四川南充地区白头鹎种群数量增长原因分析[J]. 信阳师范学院学报(自然科学版), 24(4):495-498.
朱峰, 周材权, 杨志松, 等. 2010. 四川南充白颊噪鹛的繁殖行为观察[J]. 动物学杂志, 45(4):150-155.
Alberti M. 2015. Ecoevolutionary dynamics in an urbanizing planet[J]. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 30(2):114-126.
Audet JN, Ducatez S, Lefebvre L. 2016. The town bird and the country bird:problem solving and immunocompetence vary with urbanization[J]. Behavioral Ecology, 27(2):637-644.
Beissinger SR, Osborne DR. 2010. Effects of urbanization on avian community organization[J]. The Condor, 84(1):75-83.
Blumstein DT. 2003. Flight-initiation distance in birds is dependent on intruder starting distance[J]. Journal of Wildlife Management, 67(4):852-857.
Clergeau P, Croci S, Jokimaki J, et al. 2006. Avifauna homogenisation by urbanization:analysis at different European latitudes[J]. Biological Conservation, 127(3):336-344.
Devictor V, Julliard R, Couvet D, et al. 2007. Functional homogenization effect of urbanization on bird communities[J]. Conservation Biology, 21(3):741-751.
Emlen JT. 1974. An urban bird community in Tucson, Arizona:derivation, structure, regulation[J]. The Condor, 76(2):184-197.
Gonzalez LM, Margalida A, Sánchez R, et al. 2006. Supplementary feeding as an effective tool for improving breeding success in the Spanish imperial eagle (Aquila adalberti)[J]. Biological Conservation, 129(4):477-486.
Gregg MA, Crawford JA, Drut MS, et al. 1994. Vegetational cover and predation of sage grouse nests in Oregon[J]. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 58(1):162-166.
Ricklefs RE. 1969. An analysis of nesting mortality in birds[M]. Washington, D.C.:Smithsonian Institution Press:1-48.
Slabbekoorn H. 2013. Songs of the city:noise-dependent spectral plasticity in the acoustic phenotype of urban birds[J]. Animal behavior, 85:1089-1099.
Stahlschmidt ZR, Brashears J, DeNardo DF. 2011. The role of temperature and humidity in python nest site selection[J]. Animal Behaviour, 81(5):1077-1081.
Wang YP, Chen SH, Blair RB, et al. 2009. Nest composition adjustments by Chinese bulbuls Pycnonotus sinensis in an urbanized landscape of Hangzhou[J]. Acta Ornithologica, 44(2):185-192.
Yuta T, Koizumi I. 2011. Long breeding season and high frequency of multiple brooding in great tits in northern Japan[J]. Ardea-Wageningeningen, 100(2):197-201.
CopyRight©2020 Editorial Office of Sichuan Journal of Zoology