Latest Cover

Online Office

Contact Us

Issue:ISSN 1000-7083
          CN 51-1193/Q
Director:Sichuan Association for Science and Technology
Sponsored by:Sichuan Society of Zoologists; Chengdu Giant Panda Breeding Research Foundation; Sichuan Association of Wildlife Conservation; Sichuan University
Address:College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, No.29, Wangjiang Road, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, 610064, China
Tel:+86-28-85410485
Fax:+86-28-85410485
Email:scdwzz@vip.163.com & scdwzz001@163.com
Your Position :Home->Past Journals Catalog->2015 Vol.34 No.2

A Comparison of Autumn Habitat Selection of Cervus nippon and Sus scrofa in Taohongling National Nature Reserve, China
Author of the article:LI Jia, LI Yankuo*, MIAO Lujun, XIE Guangyong, YUAN Fangkai
Author's Workplace:School of Life Sciences, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022, China
Key Words:Cervus nippon; Sus scrofa; habitat selection; Taohongling National Nature Reserve
Abstract:The systematic sampling methods were used to study the autumn habitat selection characteristics of sika deer (Cervus nippon) and wild boars (Sus scrofa) in Taohongling National Nature Reserve from October to December in 2012. The results suggested that sika deer preferred grass and bush, shorter undergrowth (0.81 m±0.36 m), higher shrub height (4.70 m±1.68 m), lower shrub density (7.56 ind.±4.55 ind.), higher altitude (365.5 m±141.7 m), gentle slopes (17.80°±12.68°), sunny slope and upper location, but randomly chose tree diameter, canopy cover and undergrowth coverage. Wild boars selected shrub, with no specific selection on other variables. Stepwise discriminate function analysis showed that the three variables of slope degree, altitude and shrub density significantly contributed to habitat separation between sika deer and wild boars (Wilk's λ=0.801, χ2=24.89, df=3, P=0.000); the discriminated equation was F=0.653×slope-0.546×altitude+0.840×shrub density+0.144, with predicted accuracy of 82.4%.
2015,34(2): 300-305 收稿日期:2013-10-30
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7083.2015.02.023
分类号:Q959.8;Q958.1
基金项目:国家自然基金项目(No.31000196);国家级自然保护区生态环境十年变化调查与评估项目(环保重大专项, No.STSN-7)
作者简介:李佳(1988—),男,硕士研究生,主要从事生态学研究,E-mail:uvwxyzzz@163.com
*通讯作者:李言阔,E-mail:liyankuo@126.com
参考文献:
付义强, 胡锦矗, 郭延蜀, 等. 2006. 桃红岭自然保护区梅花鹿对春季栖息地的利用[J]. 动物学杂志, 41(4): 60-63.
高中信, 王文. 2007. 野猪[J]. 生物学通报, 42(1): 6-7.
滚双宝. 2004. 野猪种群特性及其生态作用的研究进展[J]. 特产研究, 1: 52-56.
郭延蜀, 胡锦矗, 罗代华, 等. 1991. 四川梅花鹿的社群行为研究[J]. 兽类学报, 11(3): 165-170.
郭延蜀, 郑惠珍. 2000. 中国梅花鹿地史分布、种和亚种的划分及演化历史[J]. 兽类学报, 20(3): 168-179.
江西桃红岭梅花鹿保护区管理处. 2000. 江西桃红岭梅花鹿保护区[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社.
蒋志刚. 2009. 江西桃红岭国家自然保护区生物多样性[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社.
李佳, 李言阔, 缪泸君, 等. 2014. 江西桃红岭国家级自然保护区梅花鹿适宜性评价[J]. 生态学报, 34(5): 1274-1283.
鲁庆彬, 于江傲, 高欣, 等. 2007. 冬季清凉峰山区小麂和野猪的生境选择及差异[J]. 兽类学报, 27(1): 45-52.
骆颖, 张明明, 刘振生, 等. 2010. 贺兰山同域分布岩羊和马鹿发情季节的生境选择差异[J]. 生态学报, 30(14): 3744-3751.
马建章, 邹红菲, 贾竞波. 2004. 野生动物管理学[M]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学出版社.
申定健, 郑合勋, 王淯, 等. 2009. 四川省巴塘县矮岩羊与斑羚冬季生境比较[J]. 生态学报, 29(5): 2321-2330.
孙儒泳. 2001. 动物生态学原理(第三版)[M]. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社.
王文, 张静, 马建章. 2007. 小兴安岭南坡野猪家域分析[J]. 兽类学报, 27(3): 257-262.
吴问国, 朱文, 高依敏, 等. 2008. 江西桃红岭野生梅花鹿保护现状及管理对策[J]. 野生动物, 27(3): 457-459.
杨晶, 丁铁明, 胡平喜, 等. 1990. 梅花鹿南方亚种生态学研究初报[J]. 野生动物, 11(3): 17-19.
姚振生, 徐向荣, 徐攀. 2010. 江西桃红岭梅花鹿华南亚种食源植物分析[R]. 全国第9届天然药物资源学术研讨会: 236-331.
张劲硕. 2007. 世界猪的种、分布和现状[J]. 动物学杂志, 42(2): 7-19.
Crowell KL, Pimm SL. 1976. Competition and niche shifts of mice introduced onto small islands[J]. Oikos, 27(2): 251-258.
Forsyth DM. 2000. Habitat selection and coexistence of the Alpine chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra) and Himalayan tahr (Hemitragus jemlahicus) in the eastern southern Alps, New Zealand[J]. Journal of Zoology, 252(2): 215-225.
Fournier CC, Maillard D, Fournier P. 1995. Diet of the wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) inhabiting the Montpellier garrigue[J]. Ibex, 3: 174-179.
Gaelle D, Clement C, Anne L, et al. 2012. Spatial distribution and habitat selection in coexisting species of mountain ungulates[J]. Ecography, 35(1): 44-53.
Hariston NG. 1981. An experimental test of a guild: salamander competition[J]. Ecology, 52(1): 65-72.
Henley SR, Ward D, Schmidt I. 2007. Habitat selection by two desert-adapted ungulates[J]. Journal of arid environments, 70(1): 39-48.
Schoener TW. 1974. The compression hypothesis and temporal resource partitioning[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 71(10): 4169-4172.
Wei FW, Feng Z, Wang Z, et al. 2000. Habitat use and separation between the giant and the red panda[J]. Journal of Mammal, 80(2): 448-455.
CopyRight©2019 Editorial Office of Sichuan Journal of Zoology